ReviewOpen respiratory archives
[2027: A new year for a new epidemiological study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Spain].
Review in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A real opportunity exists to conduct a fourth epidemiological study of COPD in Spain by 2027, continuing the trilogy begun with IBERPOC (1997), EPISCAN (2007), and EPISCAN II (2017). These previous studies have been fundamental to understanding the evolution of COPD, showing a relative reduction in prevalence but a persistently high underdiagnosis rate (around 75%). The need for a new study is justified by six key reasons: 1) Monitoring the secular evolution of the disease. 2) Evaluating the impact of new exposures (pollution, vaping, etc.) and phenotypes (COPD in non-smokers, pre-COPD, etc.). 3) Integrating novel tests such as low-dose CT scans or biomarkers for earlier and more accurate diagnosis. 4) Validating new screening tools. 5) Evaluating the quality of care and the burden of disease in the post-COVID-19 era. 6) Creation of a prospective cohort for translational research. Novel funding models, such as final contributions, should be explored. This review argues that a study in 2027 would not be a mere repetition, but an opportunity to make a qualitative leap toward a multidimensional and precise characterization of COPD in Spain today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.