Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205352›Full record

ReviewOpen respiratory archives

[2027: A new year for a new epidemiological study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Spain].

Joan B Soriano, Marc Miravitlles, José Luis López-Campos, Francisco García-Río, Julio Ancochea

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joan B SorianoServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, España.
Marc MiravitllesServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitari Vall dHebron/Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, España.
José Luis López-CamposCentro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, España.
Francisco García-RíoFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España.
Julio AncocheaServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A real opportunity exists to conduct a fourth epidemiological study of COPD in Spain by 2027, continuing the trilogy begun with IBERPOC (1997), EPISCAN (2007), and EPISCAN II (2017). These previous studies have been fundamental to understanding the evolution of COPD, showing a relative reduction in prevalence but a persistently high underdiagnosis rate (around 75%). The need for a new study is justified by six key reasons: 1) Monitoring the secular evolution of the disease. 2) Evaluating the impact of new exposures (pollution, vaping, etc.) and phenotypes (COPD in non-smokers, pre-COPD, etc.). 3) Integrating novel tests such as low-dose CT scans or biomarkers for earlier and more accurate diagnosis. 4) Validating new screening tools. 5) Evaluating the quality of care and the burden of disease in the post-COVID-19 era. 6) Creation of a prospective cohort for translational research. Novel funding models, such as final contributions, should be explored. This review argues that a study in 2027 would not be a mere repetition, but an opportunity to make a qualitative leap toward a multidimensional and precise characterization of COPD in Spain today.

Indexed as

Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseSpirometryUnderdiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID42205352
PMCPMC13207508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.