SynthesisInternational journal of public health2026
Barriers to utilization of primary healthcare services: a systematic review of experiences in ten selected countries.
Synthesis in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to identify the reasons for inadequate use of PHC services to mitigate the barriers to utilization of PHC services in Saudi Arabia, Oman, Türkiye, Pakistan, Iraq, Thailand, China, India, Egypt, and Iran. Methods: This is a systematic review that synthesized the findings of original studies focused on the barriers to the utilization of PHC services. We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from February 1, 2000, to December 29, 2023, in English. We conducted content analysis facilitated by MAXQDA-10 software drawn upon Levesque's framework. Results: The screening of articles was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The initial search retrieved 1,613 results, of which we included 29 studies. In terms of methodology, 17 studies used quantitative methods, eight had qualitative approaches, and the remaining studies utilized mixed or other methods. Among the five groups of identified barriers, ability to perceive, ability to reach, and ability to pay were found to be noteworthy barriers that should be considered by health policymakers. Conclusion: Although the main barriers to inadequate use of PHC are related to people, raising awareness about the need for PHC, improving literacy through understandable training, and establishing mobile facilities in remote areas are appropriate strategies for increasing the use of PHC services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.