ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Comparative biomechanical analysis of volleyball court shoes during sport-specific tasks in competitive adolescent female volleyball players.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: High-level volleyball requires efficient movement patterns, force attenuation, and rapid, multidirectional movements. While players may exhibit inherent biomechanical risk factors, investigating how footwear affects female athletes' movement is essential for developing a comprehensive understanding of determinants contributing to injury risk. The purpose of this study was to identify biomechanical differences associated with three volleyball court shoes. Methods: Twenty-nine healthy female volleyball players (15.52 ± 1.47 years, 168.72 ± 5.72 cm, 62.44 ± 7.71 kg) completed a countermovement jump (CMJ) and three-step approach in a motion capture laboratory using a markerless motion capture system and embedded force plates under three shoe conditions. Peak lower-extremity joint angles were calculated and extracted across the landing phase. Results: RIP-IT shoes elicited the least dorsiflexion and the greatest knee flexion and external rotation. Mizuno shoes were associated with greater contributors to dynamic knee valgus during the CMJ ( Discussion: Biomechanical risk factor associations differed across shoe conditions, with RIP-IT shoes limiting shock absorption strategies, Mizuno shoes increasing contributors to dynamic knee valgus, and Adidas shoes limiting ankle ROM. These results demonstrate that different volleyball shoes influence lower extremity kinematics and joint loading, with the most pronounced differences observed at the ankle and compensatory changes at the knee and hip, highlighting how footwear can measurably alter movement strategies during sport-specific tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.