ArticleSAGE open nursing
Nurses' Knowledge and Practice Regarding Pain Assessment and Management in Patients With Cancer.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pain is a significant concern for cancer patients, particularly those in advanced stages of the disease, and it affects not only physical well-being but also psychosocial and emotional aspects. Effective pain management is critical in cancer care, with nurses playing a pivotal role in assessing and managing pain. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain assessment and management at a specialized cancer center in Amman, Jordan. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at a specialized cancer center. A total of 260 questionnaires were distributed to nurses, and 184 responses were received, resulting in a response rate of 70.8%. A convenience sample of registered nurses participated, completing the "Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain" (KASRP). Data were analyzed using SPSS with continuous variables presented as means and standard deviations (SD), and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages, Pearson correlation examined relationships among age, experience, and knowledge scores; multiple regression identified factors influencing total knowledge. Results: The study had a response rate of 70.8%. Nurses' knowledge scores ranged from 10 to 38, with a mean score of 22.98 (SD = 6.11). A weak but positive correlation was found between total knowledge scores and both age and years of nursing experience. Key gaps in knowledge were identified, particularly regarding cancer-related pain, substance abuse, and physical dependence. More than 50% of nurses correctly answered 26 of the 41 KASRP items, while 15 items had a correct response rate of less than 50%. Conclusion: The study revealed significant gaps in nurses' knowledge and practices regarding pain management, especially in areas related to cancer-related pain and opioid use. Increased experience in oncology nursing was associated with improved knowledge and practices. The findings highlight the need for targeted educational interventions to enhance pain management competencies among nurses, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.