Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205304›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2026

Sunscreen Use Barriers in White U.S. Adults: Gender, Generation, and Skin Phototype Differences.

Sarah M Hall, Mindy Steadman, Sarah Major, Mary-Frances Oldham, Hannah Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah M HallDepartment of Public Health, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Mindy SteadmanDepartment of Public Health, College of Health and Public Service, Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah.
Sarah MajorDepartment of Public Health, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Mary-Frances OldhamDepartment of Public Health, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Hannah MitchellDepartment of Public Health, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Skin cancer remains a major public health concern, and White individuals carry the highest lifetime risk and mortality. Ultraviolet exposure and sunburn are well-established skin cancer risk factors, yet regular sunscreen use remains low among U.S. adults. Few studies have assessed barriers to sunscreen use in the U.S., and prior studies are often geographically or demographically limited, restricting comparability among subgroups. Methods: A cross-sectional online panel survey of White U.S. adults (N=739) was developed and administered. Participants selected all personally relevant barriers, followed by their top barrier. Descriptive statistics summarized perceived barriers to sunscreen use. Separate multivariable logistic regression models explored the associations between demographic characteristics and barrier endorsement. Results: Overall, 20.3% of participants reported no barriers. The most commonly endorsed barriers were forgetting to bring or apply sunscreen (52.1%), disliking the feel or smell (24.2%), cost (21.7%), inconvenience (20.3%), preference for being tanned (14.1%), and difficulty in selecting an appropriate sunscreen (12.6%). Younger cohorts had greater odds of reporting at least 1 barrier than baby boomers. Generational differences were observed for forgetfulness, inconvenience, product selection, and tanning preference. Men had lower odds of endorsing a preference for being tanned than women. Skin phototype was associated with differences in cost, tanning preference, forgetfulness, and product selection. Differences in barriers were also observed for marital status, education, and income. Conclusions: Findings support audience-segmented approaches to improve sunscreen use by gender, generation, skin phototype, and socioeconomic factors. Individual-level strategies include integrating sunscreen into daily routines and using cues to action to support bringing, applying, and reapplying sunscreen. Multilevel approaches that shift tanning norms, improve product acceptability, strengthen product selection guidance, and reduce cost may further reduce barriers and support sustained use.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studieshealth behaviorhealth educationpreventive medicineskin neoplasmsSunscreening agents

Identifiers

PMID42205304
PMCPMC13207459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.