Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205239›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Demographic processes constrain global growth in gender egalitarianism.

Plamen Akaliyski, Catherine E Bowen, Stefan Gehrig, Vegard Skirbekk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Plamen AkaliyskiDepartment of Sociology and Social Policy, Lingnan University, 8 Castle Peak Road, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0157-0246
Catherine E BowenDepartment of Demography, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3887-2691
Stefan GehrigIndependent Researcher, 12161 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5270-9578
Vegard SkirbekkDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-3246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women's and men's equal participation in work, education, and politics rests upon widespread public support for gender equality. While notable increases in support for gender equality over the past decades have been celebrated, existing evidence is limited by a predominant focus on Western societies. Utilizing data from the World Values Survey and European Values Study covering 78 countries that represent >86% of the global population, we examine how population-level support for gender equality in the public sphere changed between 1995 and 2022, both globally and across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Our results indicate that, although public support for gender equality increased in most countries, it stagnated in the global population as a whole. Moreover, there has been a pronounced and increasing divergence across countries, particularly between Western and non-Western societies. We attribute part of the stagnation in global public support for gender equality to demographically induced compositional effects. Namely, we find that (i) changes in the national composition of the global population have constrained increases in global public support for gender equality; (ii) fertility is higher in countries where average support for gender equality is lower; and (iii) fertility is higher and occurs earlier among women with less egalitarian views. Given that parents typically transmit their gender-related views to their children, higher and earlier fertility among persons with less egalitarian views has likely constrained global growth in gender egalitarianism. We call for a closer examination of how demographic processes influence global trends in gender egalitarianism.

Indexed as

demographic changedifferential fertilitygender equalitygender role beliefspopulation shifts

Identifiers

PMID42205239
PMCPMC13203941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.