Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205232›Full record

ArticleJMIR XR and spatial computing2026

Predictive Factors of Augmented Reality-Based Clinical Task Performance Among Novice Users: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study.

Amogh J Vellore, Shovan Bhatia, Michael R Kann, Nicolás M Kass, Regan M Shanahan, Jacquelyn Jardini, Jayne Miner, Sohail R Daulat, Griffin Hurt, Rishi Basdeo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR XR and spatial computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amogh J VelloreDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, STE B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States, 1 412-647-3685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6771-2460
Shovan BhatiaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, STE B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States, 1 412-647-3685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8090-7208
Michael R KannDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, STE B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States, 1 412-647-3685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6362-2083
Nicolás M KassDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2968-1253
Regan M ShanahanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, STE B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States, 1 412-647-3685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-9966
Jacquelyn JardiniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, STE B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States, 1 412-647-3685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5537-7507
Jayne MinerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, STE B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States, 1 412-647-3685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5298-8713
Sohail R DaulatDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, STE B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States, 1 412-647-3685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4751-6282
Griffin HurtDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing and Information, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7355-7825
Rishi BasdeoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-3918
Nicole DonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, STE B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States, 1 412-647-3685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3836-3011
Jacob T BiehlDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing and Information, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3878-5208
Edward G AndrewsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, STE B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States, 1 412-647-3685.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3781-1548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Augmented reality (AR) can provide risk-free training for medical trainees, yet little is known about which learner characteristics facilitate adoption or inform training design. Objective: We aimed to identify which learner characteristics predict AR performance in novices. We hypothesized that higher visuospatial ability and greater video game experience would be associated with faster completion times and fewer errors. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 21 undergraduate, graduate, and medical students (median age 22, IQR 21-24 years) without previous AR experience were recruited between June and December 2024. Participants completed a technology experience survey, the mental rotation task (MRT) for visuospatial ability, a standardized 7-task AR protocol mimicking clinical use on the Microsoft HoloLens 2 (hologram manipulation, orbit tracing, anatomical plane visualization, and hologram-to-object registration), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index for cognitive load assessment. Outcome measures included completion time, slips (unintentional errors), and tracing quality. Results: All analyses used a significance of α=.05. MRT scores did not predict baseline performance time (Pearson Conclusions: Visuospatial ability does not predict clinically relevant AR performance, while extensive video game experience was associated with fewer errors. Despite previous studies emphasizing inherent learner characteristics in laparoscopy and endoscopy, covariate-adjusted models showed that AR learning curves were not significantly modified by MRT or video game experience. These findings suggest that early AR performance improvements among novice users are primarily driven by learning rather than visuospatial ability, supporting training approaches that emphasize structured practice, although the modest sample size limits detection of smaller effects.

Indexed as

augmented realitymedical educationmental rotation taskmixed realityvideo gamesvirtual realityvisuospatial ability

Identifiers

PMID42205232
PMCPMC13202514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.