ArticleDigital health
Implication of machine learning models versus traditional models for the prediction of suicidal thoughts or ideation in west of Iran; data mining approaches on a population-based cross-sectional study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify the effective factors in suicidal thoughts or ideations by comparing several classification data mining methods and logistic regression (LR). Method: This was a secondary data analysis conducted on data from a cross-sectional study involving 1500 individuals selected using multi-stage stratified cluster random sampling in the urban area of Ilam City during 2023. The data was collected by a standardized questionnaire. Five classification methods, including decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), neural networks, and LR, were used to identify the effective factors in the suicide thought or ideation. Results: Data from 1370 individuals were analyzed. The SVM model outperformed others in most indicators, with 77.9% sensitivity, 95.3% negative predictive value, and the highest balanced accuracy (79.3%). Its precision-recall AUC, along with LR, was about 60% higher than other models. In contrast, the DT model showed superior specificity (99.9%), positive predictive value (50%), positive likelihood ratio (5.60), and negative likelihood ratio (0.99). Across DT, RF, and SVM, the main predictors of suicidal ideation were suicide attempt history, tiredness of life, BMI, and age. Conclusion: AI models specifically SVM and DT outperform traditional ones for detecting suicidal ideation. Key predictors include a history of suicide attempts, being tired of life, depression, and anxiety, highlighting areas for health policymakers to focus on in prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.