Trial reportEuropean journal of sport science2026
Blood Flow Restriction Does Not Impair Single, All-Out Sprint Cycling Performance.
Trial report in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of sprint duration and blood flow restriction due to cuff pressure applied only during exercise on sprint cycling performance and psychophysiological responses. On separate days, 12 physically active young adults (9 men and 3 women) performed six 'all-out' cycling sprints (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 s) in a randomised order under three cuff pressure conditions (0%, 40% and 60% of arterial occlusion pressure [AOP]). BFR was applied exclusively during exercise bouts, with passive rest periods of 5-15 min between sprints depending on sprint duration. Power output, peripheral oxygen saturation, vastus lateralis muscle oxygenation, heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion were measured. Mean and peak power output and total work done decreased with longer sprints (i.e., 20-30 s) than shorter efforts (i.e., 5-15 s), with no differences observed between cuff pressure conditions. Ventilatory responses, heart rate and muscle oxygenation variables increased with longer sprints. Peripheral oxygen saturation remained unaffected. BFR at 40% and 60% AOP increased limb discomfort for 15-, 25- and 30-s sprints compared to 0% AOP. In conclusion, increasing the sprint duration decreased mechanical output (external load) and increased physiological strain (internal load), with these effects largely unaffected by moderate-to-high (40%-60% AOP) external limb compression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.