ArticlePopulation health management2026
Participants in Medicare's New Mandatory Bundled Payment Program.
Article in Population health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To date, most bundled payment programs have been voluntary in design. However, such programs are limited by provider and patient selection, the potential exacerbation of health disparities, and results with limited generalizability. In 2026, Medicare will address these concerns through the Transforming Episode Accountability Model (TEAM), the first mandatory program to require nationwide participation across multiple surgical procedures. To anticipate whether the TEAM model can provide generalizable evidence for scaling bundled payments nationwide, the authors used Medicare data to conduct a cross-sectional analysis comparing the characteristics of markets and hospitals selected to participate in TEAM with those that were not. The current study found that, although the 186 TEAM markets were larger than the 618 markets that will not participate, they were similar with regard to structural characteristics (e.g., Medicare advantage penetration, exposure to prior bundled payment programs) and population characteristics (e.g., education, income). The 727 TEAM hospitals differed from the 2155 others with regard to key characteristics, including teaching and safety-net status, profit margin, and patient volume. Overall, these findings suggest that TEAM may generate findings that can be generalized to all US markets while expanding the types of hospitals that have participated in bundled payment programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.