Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204737›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2026

Machine-learning algorithms identifies sTREM1 has a key biomarker for outcome prediction in critically ill.

Charles de Roquetaillade, Pierre-Louis Blot, Fabrice Uhel, Louis Boutin, Jérôme Cartailler, Tom Van Der Poll, Etienne Gayat, Alexandre Mebazaa, Benjamin Chousterman

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charles de RoquetailladeUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U942 MASCOT, Paris, F-75006, France. charles.de-roquetaillade@aphp.fr.
Pierre-Louis BlotUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U942 MASCOT, Paris, F-75006, France.
Fabrice UhelUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM UMR-S1151, CNRS UMR-S8253, Institut Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, F- 75015, France.
Louis BoutinUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U942 MASCOT, Paris, F-75006, France.
Jérôme CartaillerUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U942 MASCOT, Paris, F-75006, France.
Tom Van Der PollCentre of Infection and Molecular Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Etienne GayatUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U942 MASCOT, Paris, F-75006, France.
Alexandre MebazaaUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U942 MASCOT, Paris, F-75006, France.
Benjamin ChoustermanUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U942 MASCOT, Paris, F-75006, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrognostic assessment in critically ill patients traditionally relies on severity scores or single biomarkers, each with limited ability to capture the biological heterogeneity of critical illness.

objectiveTo compare the prognostic performance of multiple biomarkers, individually and in combination with clinical variables, using machine learning approaches for the prediction of mortality and kidney-related outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a post-hoc analysis of the FROG-ICU cohort, a prospective observational study of patients admitted to ICUs. The study included critically ill patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation or a vasoactive agent for more than 24 h. The primary outcome was day-90 mortality, secondary outcome was major adverse kidney event (MAKE) in ICU. A total of 15 plasma biomarkers were evaluated using multiparametric approach. ML models involved Random Forest (RF) and LASSO regression. Mean decrease in accuracy was used to determine variable importance in RF model. External validation was performed in the MARS cohort which involved ICU patients admitted for sepsis and septic shock.

resultsAmong 2,061 patients in the FROG-ICU day-90 mortality was 30.1%. Machine learning models achieved AUCs of 0.74, outperforming severity scores (AUC 0.64, p < 0.001). Variable importance analysis consistently identified sTREM-1 as the strongest predictor. When evaluated alone, sTREM-1 demonstrated high prognostic performance (AUC 0.72), comparable to ML models. These findings were confirmed in the MARS cohort. Similar results were observed for MAKE prediction.

conclusionsTREM-1 is a robust biomarker associated with mortality and kidney-related outcomes in critically ill patients. Its predictive performance were comparable to multiparametric machine learning models and superior to severity scores.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCritical IllnessMachine LearningTriggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1AlgorithmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisProspective StudiesRandom ForestBiomarkersTriggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1Conserved immune dysregulationICUMachine learningMAKESepsis, mortalityTreatment response prediction

Identifiers

PMID42204737
PMCPMC13274116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.