Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204716›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Structured modulations in high-density EMG patterns from a single muscle enable simultaneous control of natural and extra degrees of freedom.

Julien Rossato, Elodie Hinnekens, Daniele Borzelli, Sergio Gurgone, Denise Jennifer Berger, Andrea d'Avella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julien RossatoInterdisciplinary Center for Virtual Reality (CIREVE), University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France.
Elodie HinnekensLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCSS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Daniele BorzelliLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCSS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Sergio GurgoneCenter for Information and Neural Networks (CiNet), Advanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Denise Jennifer BergerLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCSS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Andrea d'AvellaLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCSS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy. a.davella@hsantalucia.it.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme grant agreement No. 101070292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying and exploiting independent neural inputs within a single muscle is a key step toward improving neuromuscular interfaces for motor augmentation and rehabilitation. Recent evidence suggests that motor neurons within the same pool can receive multiple, independent inputs, allowing flexible modulation of muscle activity. Harnessing this neural flexibility could enable the control of supplementary degrees of freedom (SuDoF) without interfering with the performance of natural motor tasks. However, current methods rely on motor unit decomposition, which is technically challenging and impractical for daily-life applications. This study introduces a decomposition-free approach to detect and quantify distinct neural inputs directly from high-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) and assesses the feasibility of extracting from the modulation of these neural inputs a signal for simultaneous control of natural and SuDoF.

methodsFifteen participants performed reaching and orienting tasks in a virtual environment moving a cursor by generating isometric force at the hand (force control) and rotating the cursor by modulating the pattern of HDsEMG signals recorded using a 64-channel grid from the biceps brachii (SuDoF control). HDsEMG signals were represented as vectors in a multidimensional EMG space, and its deviation from a reference vector associated with pure force control was used to control the cursor orientation. Participants reached eight planar targets with a circular cursor using only force control and reached and matched the orientation of eight elliptical targets with an elliptical cursor using force and SuDoF control. Performance across conditions was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.

resultsParticipants successfully reached targets in 89 ± 10% of force and SuDoF control trials, with cursor rotations exceeding those observed in force-only trials in 84 ± 31% of cases. Participants primarily modulated contraction amplitude but maintained distinct directional shifts in HDsEMG patterns, compatible with the modulation of different neural inputs within the motor neuron pool. However, these modulations may also partly reflect changes in overall muscle activation and recruitment.

conclusionsThis study presents a decomposition-free method to detect structured modulations in HDsEMG patterns within a single muscle. The observed modulations are compatible with the presence of distinct neural inputs and enabled concurrent control of natural and SuDoF, advancing neuromuscular interface design for assistive and rehabilitative technologies.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyMuscle, SkeletalAdultFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMaleUser-Computer InterfaceYoung AdultHigh-density electromyographyHuman augmentationMuscular null spaceMyoelectric controlNeural inputs detectionReaching

Identifiers

PMID42204716
PMCPMC13465195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.