ArticleJournal of medical case reports2026
Ophthalmic and retinal artery occlusion associated with caudate nucleus infarction in an adolescent: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBoth ophthalmic and retinal artery occlusion and caudate nucleus infarction are forms of arterial ischemic stroke, which are rare in adolescents. The causal relationship between these two events is still unclear. CASE PRESENTATION: A 17-year-old Han Chinese boy presented with vision loss in his left eye for 24 h and was diagnosed with ophthalmic and retinal artery occlusion. The ophthalmologic examination showed no light perception and no pupil light reflex. The fundus examination revealed a cherry-red spot at the macula with white ischemic retina and optic disc. Intra-arterial thrombolysis (urokinase 100,000 units and papaverine 30 mg) was performed 24 h after symptom onset. On the second day postoperatively, the patient complained of headache and dizziness, and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed subacute caudate nucleus infarction. Etiological workup including cardiac, coagulation, autoimmune, and inflammatory tests was negative except for borderline elevated cholesterol and positive CMV IgG with no evidence of active infection. Despite continuous treatment, the vision in his left eye remained sense light 2 months after he was discharged.
conclusionOphthalmic and retinal artery occlusion is an ophthalmologic emergency and deserves more aggressive treatment in adolescents. Caudate nucleus infarction is also an emergency that impairs health. In this adolescent case, the concurrent occurrence of these two events was rare, but the causal relationship remains unproven. Further etiological clarification is needed. More attention should be paid to the general condition of adolescents, and provide comprehensive assessments, treatment, and follow-ups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.