ArticleBMC women's health2026
Promoting cervical cancer screening participation among Chinese women from resource-limited settings: a multicenter qualitative study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis qualitative study aimed to explore the factors influencing participation in HPV-based cervical cancer screening among women from resource-limited settings areas in mainland China.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews based on the health belief model among women from resource-limited settings areas in China. The sample population was stratified by age and screening status, and the interviewees were continually included until the data were saturated for every subgroup. Thematic content analysis was adopted in the inductive approach.
resultsOf the 23 participants, we summarized three themes: (1) organized screening has a significant promotion, (2) lack of knowledge leads to lower perceived susceptibility and benefits, and (3) life burden keeps women away from accessing cervical cancer screening services.
conclusionTo improve the coverage rate of cervical cancer screening, authority and attractive information, as well as a supportive community, are essential to bridge the knowledge gap and increase screening participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.