Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204690›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2026

Policy gaps regarding social homecare in the context of end-of-life; a policy document analysis.

Helene Louise Elliott-Button, Kasonde Mwaba, Zana Bayley, Joan Bothma, Cat Forward, Jamilla Hussain, Justine Krygier, Mark Pearson, Paul Taylor, Caroline White and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Helene Louise Elliott-ButtonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK. Helene.Elliott-Button@hyms.ac.uk.
Kasonde MwabaWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Zana BayleyFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Joan BothmaCera Care, Baildon, Basildon, UK.
Cat ForwardHealth & Social Care Workforce Research Unit, The Policy Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Jamilla HussainWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Justine KrygierWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Mark PearsonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Paul TaylorSheffield Centre for Health Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Caroline WhiteWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Jane WrayFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Liz WalkerFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Miriam JohnsonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial homecare workers (personal aides/assistants) are crucial for people wishing to receive end-of-life care at home.

aimTo determine current UK social care policy priorities and gaps regarding end-of-life care provision by homecare workers, including support and training for this workforce.

designPolicy document review and content analysis; eligible documents were current UK policy documents informing homecare worker practice/service delivery, identified by team expertise, networks, study partners and bibliography review of included documents. We quantified (existence, frequency) predetermined codes of interest in relation to end-of-life/palliative/care of the dying/bereavement, homecare workforce, and support and training. Where homecare worker codes were contextually situated, we extracted and tabulated the surrounding text and examined for reference to training and support. We subjected extracted text content to framework analysis through the lens of Bronfenbrenner's Adapted Ecological Systems Theory.

resultsOne thousand, four hundred and sixty-four homecare worker codes were identified in the 36 included documents, but only 72 times/17 documents in the context of end-of-life care. In the context of end-of-life care and homecare workers, education and training codes were present 3 and 35 times respectively. The need for end-of-life education and training was recognised, but in general, little detail about delivery and implementation was given (e.g., whose responsibility; funding; minimum standard and content).

conclusionsThe homecare worker role in end-of-life care is poorly recognised in national policy. Little guidance is provided regarding minimum training standards or delivery. Given an ageing population globally and expected increased demand for end-of-life homecare, national and international policy guidance should include this workforce.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHome Care ServicesTerminal CareDocument AnalysisHumansUnited KingdomDocumentEducationEnd-of-lifeHomecarePolicyPracticeTraining

Identifiers

PMID42204690
PMCPMC13393774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.