Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204673›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Emergency medical team interventions involving pregnant patients of the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship (Poland) in 2020-2022.

Ewa Kowalska, Paweł Jastrzębski, Marcin Nowak, Tadeusz Miłowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ewa KowalskaSchool of Public Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland. ewa.kowalska@uwm.edu.pl.
Paweł JastrzębskiSchool of Public Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.
Marcin NowakPolice Academy in Szczytno, Institute of Preventive Service, Department of Security and Legal Sciences, Szczytno, Poland.
Tadeusz MiłowskiSchool of Public Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy is a natural and extraordinary time in a woman's life. Nonetheless, it is important to note that even during a normal course of pregnancy, there is a possibility of the manifestation of symptoms that may occur and require instantly care. The aim of this study was to analyze Emergency Medical Team (EMT) dispatches to pregnant women in 2020-2022 in the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship (Poland).

methodsThe study was conducted using retrospective analysis. 400,251 patients were screened, of which 3116 pregnant women (0.79% of total patients) were included in the study. Calls to Ground-Based Emergency Medical Teams were classified under the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). The data were also analyzed according to date of call (year, quarter, semester), territory covered by the EMT, scene of the emergency, patient age, medical procedures applied, selected vital parameters, type of emergency (life-threatening vs. not life-threatening), and patient outcome (left at the scene vs. hospitalization).

resultsGeneral analysis showed the mean age of pregnant women covered by this study to be 28.60 (SD 6.75) years. 2020 saw the highest number of dispatches (n = 1140). Most of the deployments were to locations with a population of less than 10,000 (52.98%) and to the patient's home (90.50%). 31.00% of patients received a labor-related ICD-10 diagnosis, including preterm labor and complication of labor. Placement of intravenous access (66.43%) and monitoring of vital signs (51.99%) were the most common procedures performed during the interventions. A life-threatening emergency was found in 41.8% of the women. A chi-square test showed statistically significant relationships between: patient age and life-threatening emergency (chi-square (df = 1) = 4.00; p = 0.045), life-threatening emergency and date of call (chi-square (df = 5) = 22.39; p < 0.001), as well as the area of intervention and scene of emergency (chi-square (df = 2) = 57.17; p < 0.001).

conclusionThe study showed that Emergency Medical Team interventions involving pregnant women most often concerned patients staying at home and living in smaller localities. The most common reasons for dispatch were labor and its complications, as well as other pregnancy-related conditions. The prevalence of life-threatening emergencies was higher among pregnant women aged 36 years and older. An increase in life-threatening emergencies was observed from the second half of 2020 onward, which may have been associated with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings indicate the need to enhance Emergency Medical Team training in the management of pregnant patients and obstetric emergencies. Particular attention should also be paid to the accurate assessment and documentation of basic vital signs. Special care and monitoring should be provided to pregnant women aged 36 years and older due to their increased risk of life-threatening emergencies.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesPregnancy ComplicationsAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesEmergency Medical TeamParamedicsPregnancyPregnant womenPre-hospital care

Identifiers

PMID42204673
PMCPMC13404953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.