Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204662›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Fenced enclosure and increased rainfall facilitate recovery of degraded desert steppe by restructuring soil seed bank dynamics.

Huayang Chen, Gaohua Fan, Carol C Baskin, Jerry M Baskin, Qingguo Cui, Houjia Liu, Zhenying Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huayang Chen *Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100093, Beijing, China.
Gaohua Fan *Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100093, Beijing, China.
Carol C BaskinDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, KY, 40506, Lexington, USA.
Jerry M BaskinDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, KY, 40506, Lexington, USA.
Qingguo CuiKey Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100093, Beijing, China.
Houjia LiuKey Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100093, Beijing, China.
Zhenying HuangKey Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100093, Beijing, China. zhenying@ibcas.ac.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32301667Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China 2025FY100603Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA26020103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoil seed bank is pivotal for vegetation regeneration in degraded desert steppes. However, there is limited information on the dynamic changes of aboveground vegetation and soil seed banks across different degradation stages of desert steppe following removal of grazing. Influence of 2-year fenced enclosure treatment and precipitation on changes of soil seed banks and aboveground vegetation of different degraded grasslands in west Ordos of North China were studied.

resultsThe climax community of desert steppe was dominated by Stipa breviflora. As degree of degradation increased due to intensified grazing, the dominant species were S. breviflora → Artemisia scoparia → Eragrostis minor → Peganum harmala. In addition, as degree of degradation increased aboveground species richness and density decreased, belowground richness declined, but seed bank density increased. Species similarity first decreased and then increased. In the starting year of enclosure (2021), Sorensen similarity index of aboveground and belowground vegetation of moderately and intensely grazed areas was lower than that of the control. After 1-2 years, the similarity index increased, showing that enclosure (fencing) increased the number of species in both enclosures. After 1 to 2 years of fencing, soil seed bank density continued to increase while diversity did not change, driven by increased seed production of E. minor and that of P. harmala decreasing. Growing-season precipitation increased in the above-average year of 2022 and a slightly below-average year of 2023, and it was significantly associated with increasing seed bank species density and aboveground species richness. Thus, seed bank community structure was altered by a reduction in P. harmala and an increase in E. minor but without a change in richness.

conclusionsThe combined effects of 2-year short-term enclosure and increased natural precipitation enhanced aboveground species density and seed bank capacity and facilitated the early natural restoration of degraded grasslands.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGrasslandRainSeed BankSeedsSoilBiodiversityChinaDesert ClimatePoaceaeSoilDegraded desert steppeFenced enclosureGrazing; soil seed bankVegetation recovery

Identifiers

PMID42204662
PMCPMC13251027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.