ArticleBMC psychology2026
Revealing symptom-level vulnerabilities between academic involution and anxiety: a network analysis.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcademic involution-escalating but low-yield academic effort-has become a salient feature of Chinese higher education. Although initial studies suggest a positive association between involution and anxiety, the specific symptom-to-symptom associations remain unclear.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,403 undergraduates in Shandong Province, China (mean age = 19.3 years; 34.9% male). Academic involution was assessed with the 24-item Academic Involution Scale, and anxiety symptoms with the 20-item Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale. A regularized partial correlation network was estimated using Graphical Gaussian Models with EBIC-LASSO. Central and bridge nodes were identified via expected influence (EI) and bridge expected influence (BEI).
resultsAcademic involution dimensions were positively correlated with anxiety (r = 0.35-0.63, p < 0.001). In the network, the most central anxiety symptoms were dizziness (EI = 1.20), panic (EI = 1.17), and faintness (EI = 1.12). Effort-reward (BEI = 0.38) and self-monitoring (BEI = 0.26) showed the highest bridge expected influence values in the network. Bootstrapping indicated narrow confidence intervals and stable centrality estimates (CS = 0.75).
conclusionsThese findings highlight that academic involution was conditionally associated with anxiety symptoms in specific cognitive-behavioral (effort-reward imbalance, self-monitoring) and physiological (somatic hyperarousal) patterns. Identifying central and bridge symptoms provides a hypothesis‑generating framework for generating more targeted hypotheses for future intervention research on both cognitive evaluations and bodily manifestations of stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.