Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204633›Full record

ReviewPerioperative medicine (London, England)2026

Neonatal outcome following norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for treatment of spinal-induced hypotension among women undergoing caesarean section: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Tesfaye Asefa Hordofa, Tajera Tageza Ilala, Kurabachew Mengistu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tesfaye Asefa HordofaDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Madda Walabu University, Robe, Oromia, Ethiopia. tesfayeasefa954@gmail.com.
Tajera Tageza IlalaDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Kurabachew MengistuDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to preventing spinal induced hypotension. In obstetrics, norepinephrine may be an alternative to phenylephrine because it better maintains cardiac output and heart rate. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify neonatal outcomes and maternal haemodynamic effects.

methodsThe systematic review of literature searched was conducted through electronic databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from February 1 to May 30,2025. All of the articles included in the review and meta-analysis were randomised controlled trials, and the populations of the study were normal pregnancies that underwent caesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

resultsA 19 studies of randomised controlled trials involving 2603 participants were included after screening 2446 records. Both prophylactic (MD = 0.17.95%CI: -0.06-0.4, p = 0.15) and therapeutic (MD = 0.03,95%CI: -0.18-0.23, p = 0.79) administration of norepinephrine showed no statistically significant difference in 1 min Apgar scores compared with phenylephrine. However, norepinephrine was associated with slightly higher 5 min Apgar scores during therapeutic administration compared with prophylactic administration (MD = 0.16,95% CI:0.01-0.31, p = 0.04). Norepinephrine revealed that no statistically significant difference in umbilical arterial partial carbon dioxide compared with phenylephrine when administered as bolus, infusion or combined bolus and infusion (MD = -0.98, 95%CI: -3.32-1.35, p = 0.41, MD = 0.43,95%CI: -0.54-1.4, p = 0.38 and MD = 0.25(-0.42-1.92) respectively. In contrast, norepinephrine significantly increased umbilical arterial bicarbonate level during therapeutic adminstration compared with prophylactic or combined prophylactic or therapeutic administration with phenylephrine (MD = 0.74,95%CI:0.15-1.33.p = 0.01). Regarding maternal outcomes,norepinephrine significantly reduced the risk of maternal bradycardia both in prophylactic (RR = 0.52,95%CI:0.34-0.78,p-0.02) and in therapeutic administratuin (RR = 0.46, 95%CI:0.29-0.72, p = 0.0006) compared with phenylephrine. Furthermore, pooled analysis showed that norepinephrine administration during combined of both prophylactic and therapeutic administration (RR = 0.29,95%CI:0.12-0.65, p = 0.003) was associated with lower risk of maternal reflex hypertension than during therapeutic and prophylactic alone compared with phenylephrine.

conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis shows women treated with bolus or infusion, prophylactic or therapeutic administration of norepinephrine have comparable neonatal outcome and maternal haemodynamics with phenylephrine. Therefore, Norepinephrine is an alternative vasopressor for management of spinal induced hypotension and for good neonatal outcome.

Indexed as

Caesarean sectionsNeonateNorepinephrinePhenylephrineSpinal induced hypotensionVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID42204633
PMCPMC13483524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.