Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204631›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Insights into the microbiota profile of Pediculus humanus capitis using metagenomic next-generation sequencing and molecular detection of unexpected pathogen DNA in Hunan Province, China.

Yi-Tian Fu, Yuan-Ping Deng, De-Yong Duan, Yan-Yan Peng, Yi-Liu Liu, Ya Zhang, Zi-Kai Xu, Hany M Elsheikha, Guo-Hua Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yi-Tian FuResearch Center for Parasites & Vectors, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Yuan-Ping DengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Tarim University, Alaer, 843300, China.
De-Yong DuanResearch Center for Parasites & Vectors, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Yan-Yan PengResearch Center for Parasites & Vectors, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Yi-Liu LiuResearch Center for Parasites & Vectors, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Ya ZhangResearch Center for Parasites & Vectors, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Zi-Kai XuResearch Center for Parasites & Vectors, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Hany M ElsheikhaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK. Hany.Elsheikha@nottingham.ac.uk.
Guo-Hua LiuResearch Center for Parasites & Vectors, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China. liuguohua5202008@163.com.

Funding

the Hunan Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund Project 2024JJ6548the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32473057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe head louse, Pediculus humanus capitis, remains a significant public health concern affecting millions of people worldwide and has been implicated as a potential vector for multiple human pathogens. Characterization of the microbiota of head lice could improve our understanding of their public health significance and potential role in pathogen transmission. Here, we characterize the microbiota of  head lice and investigate microbiota differences among different clades of head lice.

methodsHead lice were collected from Hunan Province, China, and classified into clade A and clade B (CACB) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based genotyping. The microbiota of pooled CACB of head lice samples (n = 46) was investigated by metagenomic shotgun sequencing and comparatively analysed at the phylum, genus, and species levels. In addition, the prevalence of potential pathogen DNA in head lice samples (n = 204) was assessed using real-time PCR with stringent negative controls.

resultsWe obtained non-redundant CACB microbial gene catalog comprising 79,232 genes, of which 4.70% (3,722 genes) were taxonomically assigned. The relative abundance of bacteria (2.52%) was higher than that of eukaryotes (2.04%), viruses (0.11%), and archaea (0.02%). Comparative analysis identified 655 and 750 unique genes in CACB, respectively. The dominant phyla in the CACB of head lice were Proteobacteria. At the genus level, DNA sequences corresponding to Anaplasma (25.98%; 53/204), Mycobacterium (24.02%; 49/204), Chlamydia (23.53%; 48/204), Ehrlichia (10.29%; 21/204), and Vibrio (0.49%; 1/204) were detected, suggesting the presence of bacterial DNA from these taxa.

conclusionsOur results provide a preliminary characterization of the annotated fraction of the CACB microbiome in head lice. The high proportion of unannotated genes (>95%) underscores the limited representation of louse-associated microbial genomes in public databases and suggests  substantial, yet unexplored, microbial diversity. The detection of pathogen DNA does not confirm organism viability or vector competence,however it may suggest prior exposure, mechanical carriage, or residual DNA from blood meals. These exploratory findings contribute new insights into the microbiota associated with human lice.

Indexed as

BacteriaLice InfestationsMicrobiotaPediculusAnimalsChinaFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomicsPhylogenyHead louseMetagenomic next-generation sequencingMicrobiotaPathogen DNAPediculus humanus capitis

Identifiers

PMID42204631
PMCPMC13397650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.