ArticleBMC psychology2026
Depression in left-behind children: a network analysis and chained mediation of attachment and emotion regulation.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment in Greek Adolescents.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrbanization has swelled the ranks of left-behind children (LBC), whose mental health - especially depression - now draws mounting global concern. Previous studies have shown that LBC are more prone to develop insecure parental attachments and tend to adopt maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, both established predictors of depression.
objectiveInvestigate the specific pathways through which attachment and emotion regulation mediate the impact of left-behind experiences on depression. PARTICIPANTS AND
settingIn three middle schools in Qiqihar, a total of 1,125 children aged 12-17 were sampled, including 573 LBC and 552 non‑left‑behind children (NLBC).
methodsThe questionnaire survey includes a Left-behind Status Questionnaire, the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA), the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA), and the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI).
results(1) LBC scored significantly lower than NLBC in maternal attachment, paternal attachment, and cognitive reappraisal, while scoring significantly higher in expressive suppression and depression; (2) LBC showed network structure distinct from NLBC, with maternal attachment showing lower centrality and weaker coupling with paternal attachment; (3) LBC with both parents absent showed network structure and global strength distinct from NLBC, along with weaker maternal-paternal attachment correlation; (4) all four mediating pathways exhibited significant chain effects.
conclusions(1) Left-behind experiences are associated with weakened parent-child attachment, reduced cognitive reappraisal, increased expressive suppression, and a heightened risk of depression; (2) In LBC, maternal attachment shows lower centrality, and the coupling between maternal and paternal attachment is significantly weaker, indicating a less coordinated parental attachment system. (3) The absence of both parents has a far greater effect on reshaping children's psychological networks than the absence of the father alone. (4) parent-child attachment and emotion regulation mediated the association between left-behind experiences and depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.