ArticleBMC psychology2026
A scoping review of internet addiction and academic performance among health sciences students.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInternet addiction (IA) poses a public health concern in medical education settings. Despite students' increasing reliance on the internet for learning, evidence regarding its direct impact on quantitative academic performance indicators is conflicting and fragmented. This study aimed to map the scope, nature, and characteristics of existing research on the association between IA and academic performance among healthcare students.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted in international and regional databases from inception to November 15, 2025. Out of 1,325 initial records, 15 eligible studies were selected for final analysis after screening.
resultsThe findings indicate a concerning prevalence of IA (ranging from 6% to 84%) and a complex and predominantly indirect relationship with academic performance. Although a direct association with Grade Point Average was not statistically significant in all studies, IA was strongly correlated with impairments in learning process quality (surface learning approach, academic burnout), mental health (strong comorbidity with depression and anxiety), and even physical health. Identified risk factors included Type D personality, patterns of mobile phone multitasking, and negative academic experiences.
conclusionIA is a multidimensional phenomenon primarily affecting medical students' cognitive and emotional capital. Effective management requires understanding its complex mechanisms, implementing evidence-based educational interventions, and creating supportive educational frameworks. Additionally, longitudinal and interventional studies are needed to better clarify outcomes and evaluate preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.