ArticleStem cell research & therapy2026
Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro expansion for regenerative applications: tracking small genetic variants reveals dynamic changes within a genetically stable framework.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe extended use of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) for cellular therapies raises safety concerns, and preliminary controls are needed before clinical application to guarantee patient safety. In vitro expansion is frequently required to obtain sufficient material, with an increased risk of appearance and selection of genetically altered or senescent cells, which could impair not only safety but also the biological potential and therapeutic efficacy of these cells. In vitro manipulated MSCs must adhere to the guidelines of Good Manufacturing Practices including the verification of genomic stability, transformation potential and senescence. Several tests are currently used, mainly karyotyping, which enables the detection of large alterations. Small alterations, albeit potentially important, are usually not evaluated, except for selected known mutations in a few crucial genes.
methodsHere, the potential of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to detect small DNA alterations was exploited as a reliable tool to monitor the genetic stability of cells manipulated prior to therapeutic application. The acquisition of small somatic mutations during in vitro culture of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells from 23 osteoarthritis patients was investigated at different times from passage 1 to passage 10 using targeted NGS of a panel of human cancer-related genes. Moreover, copy number variations in selected genes were analyzed using both the 'Coverage Analysis' plugin and digital PCR.
resultsOverall genetic stability was maintained, despite the emergence of sporadic variants, some with pathogenic potential or of uncertain significance, reflecting dynamic changes in culture. No copy number variations occurred during in vitro culture.
conclusionsTime in culture is confirmed as a key variable influencing the acquisition of genetic alterations, underscoring the importance of minimizing expansion times to preserve genetic stability. Given the potential impact of small genetic alterations on cellular function and the high next generation sequencing processivity and throughput, exploring incoming mutations in MSC cells via NGS turns out to be not only a perspective research pursuit, but also a robust strategy for surveillance of genetic stability. Integrating this approach into quality control guidelines would support standardized monitoring of the genomic integrity of manipulated MSCs prior to clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.