ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
Morphofunctional effects of captivity on the microanatomy of the talus bone in a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa).
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Morphofunctional effects of captivity on the microanatomy of the talus bone in a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa).Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Captive environments induce plastic and adaptive phenotypic changes to the inner and outer anatomy of vertebrate bones. However, the respective effects of these changes are not well documented. This study examines the impact of captivity on the microanatomy of the talus, an ankle bone that lacks muscular attachment but is involved in supporting the body weight during locomotion. This study focuses on the wild boar (Sus scrofa) as a wild ungulate model and on an experimental setting through which these wild boars experienced different mobility patterns during their growth: 20 lived in their natural habitat, while 21 were born in the wild but raised in captivity, either in a large enclosure (10) or in a stable (11). We quantitatively investigated the microanatomical structure of their talus using 3D cartographies of compact bone thickness and five microanatomical parameters, while describing the distribution of compact bone and the trabecular network from the cartographies and virtual sections. While the absolute thickness of compact bone remains similar regardless of the mobility context, specimens that have been raised in captivity have tali with greater bone density and a tighter network of bone trabeculae but a lower relative maximum thickness of compact bone. Our results show that captivity induces a plastic response in the bone microanatomy, which could therefore serve as a valuable indicator of the early process of domestication of wild boars and, more generally, wild ungulates in the bioarchaeological records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.