ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Enhancing persistence while managing cytokine release syndrome to embrace next-generation CAR-T cell therapy.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCAR-T cell therapy represents a major breakthrough in hematological malignancies. However, the trade-off between insufficient treatment persistence and treatment-related toxicities (especially cytokine release syndrome, CRS) still limits its wider clinical application. MAIN BODY: Our review aims to reframe the understanding of this central dilemma. It posits that the dynamic imbalance of intracellular signaling networks and external inflammation in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are the causes of insufficient persistence of CAR-T cells and the severe CRS. The intracellular signaling network and the influence of the external TME jointly regulate CAR-T cell persistence and inflammatory response. We explore strategies for designing CAR-T cells that simultaneously enhance persistence and mitigate severe CRS risk. The next-generation goal is to achieve an optimal therapeutic outcome in which CAR-T cells exhibit sustained antitumor efficacy alongside a favorable safety profile.
conclusionThe central thesis posits that persistence and safety do not have to be chosen one at the expense of the other. Rather, the relationship between persistence and CRS exists in harmony. Through the precise modulation, it is feasible to simultaneously enhance CAR-T cell persistence while effectively mitigating CRS. This review paints a blueprint for the next-generation CAR-T cell therapies that are both more persistent and inherently safer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.