SynthesisReproductive health2026
The impacts of climate change on women's reproductive and sexual health: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate change is considered a substantial threat to women's health, particularly in their reproductive and sexual well-being. Several studies linked to changes in fertility rates, ovarian reserve, menopause timing, maternal and child health outcomes, and reproductive decision-making. While recent studies have suggested a correlation between climate variability and reproductive and sexual health outcomes, a comprehensive synthesis of existing research on this relationship is lacking.
aimThis study systematically reviews the available evidence on the association between climate change and women's reproductive and sexual health.
methodsA thorough search was conducted across Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2024. This review follows a registered protocol with the PROSPERO database (ID: CRD42024575251). Data were extracted using a standardized template, and quality evaluation was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tools.
resultsThe search identified 3581 records, from which 12 observational studies were selected following screening. Most included studies were of moderate quality. Exposures were assessed using direct meteorological measures and subjective perceptions of climate change. The findings indicate that high temperatures are significantly associated with adverse outcomes. These include reduced ovarian reserve, lower fertility rates, and diminished reproductive decision-making. Extreme weather events were linked to negative social consequences like forced marriages, while specific regional climates were associated with premature menopause. Concerns about climate change also shape reproductive intentions, as eco-anxiety influences decisions to have smaller families. Conversely, higher latitude correlated with lower fertility rates.
conclusionThe review emphasizes the substantial adverse impacts of climate change, whether manifested through winter cold or rising temperatures, on women's reproductive and sexual health. Enhanced public health strategies and more longitudinal studies are needed to establish causality and address women's vulnerabilities in the face of escalating climate impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.