ArticleBMC surgery2026
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score matched analysis.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are particularly vulnerable to postoperative complications after liver resection. Evidence on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) specifically in elderly individuals undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC remains limited.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed elderly patients (70-85 years) with pathologically confirmed HCC who underwent elective laparoscopic hepatectomy at a single tertiary center between June 2018 and June 2024. Patients managed with a standardized ERAS pathway were compared with those receiving conventional perioperative care. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, liver function, and surgical factors. The primary endpoint was postoperative length of stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints included time to gastrointestinal recovery, postoperative pain scores, complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), rates of pleural effusion, 30-day readmission, and total hospitalization costs.
resultsAfter matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the ERAS and conventional care groups. Compared with conventional care, the ERAS group achieved earlier gastrointestinal recovery (shorter time to first flatus and liquid diet) and shorter urinary catheterization. Median postoperative LOS was significantly reduced, and total hospitalization costs were lower in the ERAS group. ERAS patients reported lower pain scores on postoperative days 1 and 3 and experienced fewer overall and pulmonary complications, particularly pleural effusion, without an increase in life-threatening (Clavien-Dindo grade IV-V) complications or 30-day readmissions.
conclusionsIn carefully selected elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC, implementation of an ERAS protocol appears safe and feasible, and is associated with accelerated recovery, fewer complications, and reduced healthcare costs compared with conventional perioperative care. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to further define the role of ERAS in more vulnerable elderly subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.