ArticleBMC oral health2026
A proposed clinical framework for intentional tooth replantation based on healing dynamics: case series.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intentional tooth replantation (ITR) serves as a definitive, tooth-preserving treatment but has limited success rate. Its clinical predictability is often hampered by inconsistent management protocols. Previously, ambiguity regarding the postoperative healing process has led to significant variability in follow-up schedules and assessment criteria. This article presents 4 successful cases of ITR with long-term follow-up, systematically describing the clinical and radiographic findings at postoperative intervals of 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and beyond 1 year, 2 years or even 5 years. Based on these cases and our cumulative experience with 22 ITR cases. We systematically propose a clinical framework for the management of ITR based on the dynamic healing process, including follow-up timeline, key evaluation criteria, and clinical significance. The aim is to enhance the predictability and success rate of ITR, thereby facilitating the long-term preservation of the natural dentition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.