Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204512›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

The comparative effects of prenatal exposure to methadone versus buprenorphine for opioid use disorder on neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lindsay A Wilson, Samuel Tobias, Preet Gandhi, Bohdan Nosyk, Jane A Buxton, Lianping Ti

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindsay A WilsonSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Samuel TobiasSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Preet GandhiFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bohdan NosykCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jane A BuxtonSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lianping TiBritish Columbia Centre On Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada. bccsu-lt@bccsu.ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth methadone and buprenorphine are considered safe for use for the treatment of opioid use disorder, but the comparative effectiveness of these regimens during pregnancy has not been well-established. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify and synthesize published evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies to evaluate the impacts of methadone and buprenorphine on neonatal health outcomes.

methodsWe searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies that compared outcomes among individuals who received methadone during pregnancy to individuals who received buprenorphine (with or without naloxone) during pregnancy. Outcomes of interest were preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age, stillbirth, neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) diagnosis, and NOWS treatment. We conducted separate pooled analyses for the RCTs and observational studies to generate pooled unadjusted risk ratios (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and 95% prediction intervals. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias-2 tool.

findingsA total of 27 studies (22 observational, 4 RCTs, and one study that included an observational arm and an RCT arm) were included for data extraction and synthesis. The studies included a combined total of 14,978 individuals exposed to buprenorphine and 8,358 individuals exposed to methadone. In the pooled unadjusted analyses of the observational studies, compared with methadone, buprenorphine was associated with lower risk of preterm birth (unadjusted RR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.57-0.70); low birthweight (unadjusted RR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.36-0.64), small for gestational age (unadjusted RR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.77-0.89), and NOWS treatment (unadjusted RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.61-0.78). Our findings suggested no difference between groups in terms of NOWS diagnosis or stillbirth, although stillbirth was rare.

conclusionsIn this meta-analysis, exposure to buprenorphine during pregnancy was associated with lower unadjusted risk of several adverse birth outcomes. The quality of the available evidence was limited by a lack of adjustment for key covariates, heterogeneity in the included analyses, and small sample sizes.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeNeonatal Abstinence SyndromePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStillbirthBuprenorphineMethadoneBuprenorphineMeta-analysisMethadoneNeonatal healthOpioid agonist treatmentOpioid use disorderPregnancySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42204512
PMCPMC13465529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.