Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204388›Full record

ArticlePest management science2026

Deciphering the nematicidal potential of plant-origin bioactive compounds against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, through toxicity and molecular approaches.

Narmadha Kamaraj, Seenivasan Nagachandrabose, Sathyamoorthy Pon, Devrajan Kandasamy, Senthil Kuppusamy, Raja Kalimuthu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Narmadha KamarajDepartment of Nematology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
Seenivasan NagachandraboseDepartment of Nematology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5846-2302
Sathyamoorthy PonDepartment of Basic Engineering and Applied Sciences, AEC & RI, Kumulur, India.
Devrajan KandasamyDepartment of Nematology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3307-3700
Senthil KuppusamyDepartment of Soil science and Agricultural chemistry, ADAC & RI, Trichy, India.
Raja KalimuthuCenter for Agricultural Nanotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEco-friendly management of Meloidogyne incognita remains a major challenge. Although several plant-origin bioactive compounds (POBCs) have shown efficacy against M. incognita, comparative evaluation to identify priority candidates for formulation and validation remains limited. This study evaluated bio-efficacy and potential interaction profiles of 16 POBCs against M. incognita through in vitro, glasshouse and in silico approaches.

resultsAt 500 μg mL

conclusionThis study demonstrates that isothiocyanate- and aldehyde-based POBCs are most promising candidates for developing eco-friendly nematicides and warrant further biochemical validation, formulation, dose optimization, and field evaluation. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

Antinematodal AgentsIsothiocyanatesTylenchoideaAnimalsMolecular Docking SimulationAntinematodal AgentsIsothiocyanatesaldehydesisothiocyanatemolecular dockingnematicidal activityplant‐origin bioactive compounds

Identifiers

PMID42204388
PMCPMC13453174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.