Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204332›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Deep learning of 777 K bulk transcriptomes reveals human-mouse gene conservation beyond DNA sequence similarity.

Zheng Su, Mingyan Fang, Andrei Smolnikov, Fatemeh Vafaee, Marcel E Dinger, Emily C Oates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zheng Su *School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mingyan Fang *State Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, BGI Research, Shenzhen, China.
Andrei SmolnikovSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Fatemeh VafaeeSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. f.vafaee@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7521-2417
Marcel E DingerSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. marcel.dinger@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4423-934X
Emily C OatesSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. e.oates@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8836-1681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice are widely used as biomedical research models, yet results from mouse gene studies often differ from equivalent studies in humans despite similarities in DNA sequences. Here we show that gene expression patterns provide additional insight into human-mouse gene relationships. Using the Transformer-based GeneRAIN model on 777 K human and mouse bulk RNA sequencing samples, we generate RNA-based representations of genes and compare homologous genes across species. We identify 2,407 human-mouse homologous genes with high DNA sequence similarity but distinct RNA characteristics, which are more likely to have different disease or phenotype associations. We also identify 3,070 genes with low similarity at both DNA and RNA levels, suggesting a high risk of cross-species discrepancies. Our approach also identifies long noncoding RNA homologs based on cross-species RNA conservation. These results provide a resource for evaluating the suitability of mouse models for studying specific human genes.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceDeep LearningTranscriptomeAnimalsDNAGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiceSpecies SpecificityDNA

Identifiers

PMID42204332
PMCPMC13490456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.