ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
Symptoms and subtypes of patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction - insights from the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower urinary tract dysfunction presents with a wide range of bothersome urinary symptoms, which are common in both men and women, with incidence and prevalence increasing with age. Individuals with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suffer from the chronicity of their symptoms, have a reduced quality of life, and experience high morbidity with associated medical conditions. Various treatment options exist, but many patients do not find satisfactory or lasting relief. The Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN) was formed in 2012 with the goals of improving methods for assessing patient-reported experiences with LUTS; identifying and describing patient subtypes; and generating data, research tools and biological samples for future studies. LURN developed three self-report instruments for measuring LUTS. More than 1,000 men and women with LUTS seeking treatment were enrolled, and completed a baseline and interval assessments throughout a 12-month observational period. Findings from LURN studies showed that various biological, non-urological, psychosocial and behavioural factors contribute to the development and persistence of LUTS. Additionally, patients seeking care for LUTS often present with a wider variety of urological symptoms than previously thought. Diagnoses for these patients do not reliably fit into traditional categories such as overactive bladder or BPH. LURN has addressed its objectives by creating new, top-tier assessment tools; conducting studies to gather clinically relevant data to identify potential new and accurate patient subtypes; and collecting a wealth of data and biological samples for future research to continue subtype refinement.
Identifiers
42204281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.