ArticleScientific reports2026
Frequency, clinical characteristics and cataract surgery outcomes of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in patients with senile cataracts: a review of hospital-based data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the frequency of pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEXS), its ocular and systemic clinical features in patients scheduled for cataract surgery, and to evaluate surgical complications and outcomes. Data from 585 eyes that underwent cataract surgery were included in this retrospective study. Data retrieved from patient files and our hospital's electronic medical records were reviewed, including the presence of PEXS, pupil dilation, cataract type, nuclear hardness according to Lens Opacities Classification System III, and glaucoma. Additionally, data on clinical characteristics of pre-existing systemic diseases, surgical outcomes, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were also noted. The data were analyzed between two groups: eyes with PEXS and eyes without PEXS. The frequency of PEXS was 10.7%. The most common type of cataracts in the PEXS group was nuclear cataracts. Nuclear cataracts were harder in eyes with PEXS than in eyes without PEXS. Mean intraocular pressure was significantly higher in eyes with PEXS than in eyes without PEXS (p = 0.001). The prevalence of glaucoma was significantly higher in the PEXS group (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the frequency of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The non-PEXS group showed significantly better best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) compared to the PEXS group at the first week postoperatively (p = 0.001). However, BCVA was comparable between groups at the one-month postoperative visit. The frequency of PEXS was relatively high in our study. Awareness of the potential risks associated with PEXS in cataract surgery is essential, and appropriate preparations, including necessary surgical tools and techniques, should be made to ensure optimal outcomes. Although no differences were observed in the rates of intraoperative complications between the groups, this finding should be interpreted cautiously and should not be considered as evidence of equivalent surgical risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.