ArticleScientific reports2026
Trend term and noise removal method for blasting vibration signals based on Fourier decomposition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The trend term and noise in blasting vibration signals severely affect the accuracy of analysis. However, existing adaptive decomposition methods still have limitations in removing these trend and noise components. This study develops a Fourier decomposition-based (FDM) preprocessing approach for blasting vibration signals by optimizing key parameters, including the cross-correlation threshold, the ultra-low-frequency energy threshold, and the decomposition search path. A comparison between the High-to-Low Frequency Searching (HTL-FS) and Low-to-High Frequency Searching (LTH-FS) search paths indicates that LTH-FS achieves superior decomposition performance when applied to blasting vibration signals. The sensitivity of FDM to different ultra-low-frequency energy thresholds is systematically examined, and a criterion for identifying valid components is established. The results demonstrate that FDM can effectively separate low-frequency trend components, high-frequency noise, and meaningful signal information in blasting vibration records. Compared with Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN), and Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), the pure signal obtained via FDM exhibits the smoothest time-history curve, the highest signal-to-noise ratio (23.2406), and the lowest root-mean-square error (0.0246). At the same time, this paper further confirms the effectiveness of FDM as a high-precision preprocessing method for blasting signals by analyzing the blasting vibration signals in two actual cases: the Chongli Tunnel blasting project and the Caomao Mountain Tunnel blasting project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.