Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204236›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A complex network analysis of São Paulo rail-based urban mobility from smart-card data in 2019 and 2020.

M B Izidoro, P H T Schimit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M B IzidoroInformatics and Knowledge Management Graduate Program, Universidade Nove de Julho, Rua Vergueiro, 235/249, São Paulo, SP, 01525-000, Brazil.
P H T SchimitInformatics and Knowledge Management Graduate Program, Universidade Nove de Julho, Rua Vergueiro, 235/249, São Paulo, SP, 01525-000, Brazil. schimit@alumni.usp.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5474-6145

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 421779/2022-5Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.983720/2024-00Fundação de Amparo á Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/16196-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper analyses rail-based urban mobility in the São Paulo Metropolitan Region using anonymised smart card validations from the electronic ticketing system. We reconstruct estimated origin-destination flows from single-tap records and model the system as daily weighted mobility networks, where nodes represent stations and edges represent inferred passenger flows between stations. Classical and weighted network metrics, together with rank dynamics and community detection, are used to characterise the temporal evolution of rail mobility before and during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (2019-2020). The results reveal a sharp contraction and spatial reorganisation of the network in early 2020, with reduced system-wide efficiency, increased effective distances and stronger fragmentation into communities, consistent with more localised patterns and with survey-based evidence reported by the São Paulo Metro Company's (Metrô) official Origin-Destination Survey 2023. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: (i) a Transaction Sequence Number-based procedure to infer inter-station OD flows from single-tap validations; (ii) the construction of daily rail-mobility networks for 2019-2020; and (iii) a network framework to track structural changes in demand, connectivity and community structure organisation over time.

Indexed as

COVID-19RailroadsBrazilCitiesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Complex networksCOVID-19Rail transitSmart card dataUrban mobility

Identifiers

PMID42204236
PMCPMC13442837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.