Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204234›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Morphometric, biochemical, and mineral elements richness in the leaves of two pear species (Pyrus elaeagnifolia and Pyrus communis).

Aydın Uzun, Ahmet Sümbül, Mehmet Yaman, Ercan Yıldız, Hasan Talha Ünsal, Yusuf Murat Keçe, Adem Güneş, Kadir Uğurtan Yılmaz, Ramazan Bıçar, Merve İnanç and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aydın UzunFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-0640
Ahmet SümbülSuşehri Timur Karabal Vocational School, Department of Plant and Animal Production, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Suşehri, Sivas, Türkiye. asumbul3188@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9510-0992
Mehmet YamanFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2899-2238
Ercan YıldızFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1445-2385
Hasan Talha ÜnsalFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-7255
Yusuf Murat KeçeFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-0894
Adem GüneşFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-6134
Kadir Uğurtan YılmazFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-3898
Ramazan BıçarFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye, Turkey.
Merve İnançFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye, Türkiye.
Yazgan TunçRepublic of Türkiye, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Hatay Olive Research Institute Directorate, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies, Hassa Station, 31700, Hassa, Hatay, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-8657
Ali KhadiviDepartment of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak University, Arak, 38156-8-8349, Iran. a-khadivi@araku.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6354-445X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the morphometric characteristics, mineral composition, and bioactive compound richness of the leaves of wild pear (Pyrus elaeagnifolia) genotypes naturally occurring in the Central Anatolia region and of commonly cultivated pear (Pyrus communis L.) varieties. To the best of our knowledge, the biochemical and mineral composition of the leaves of P. elaeagnifolia, a species endemic to Anatolia, has not been fully characterized. The study findings revealed significant genotypic variation in all measured characters. Petiole length varied between 3.38 (104) and 39.30 mm (Deveci), petiole thickness varied between 0.65 (27) and 1.93 mm (44), leaf width varied between 7.85 (27) and 30.65 mm (30), and leaf length varied between 24.98 (27) and 68.71 mm (104). Based on the mineral element content of the leaves, calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) were identified as the dominant elements. In terms of mineral element content, P. elaeagnifolia was richer than P. communis. In leaves, Ca content varied between 96.37 (40) and 309.17 (58) mg/kg, K content varied between 47.18 (35) and 71.57 (36) mg/kg, P content varied between 33.93 (47) and 98.66 (30) mg/kg, and S content varied between 103.59 (47) and 149.92 (30) mg/kg dry weight. Total phenolic content (TPC) varied between 97.85 (115) and 165.34 (49) mg GAE g

Indexed as

MineralsPlant LeavesPyrusGenotypeMineralsAntioxidant activityHierarchical clustering analysisMineral compositionPCAPhenolic contentWild pear leaves

Identifiers

PMID42204234
PMCPMC13448664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.