ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-fractal vascular tree model for characterizing blood flow in cardiovascular system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cardiovascular system's hemodynamics is pivotal for tissue oxygen and nutrient delivery. However, accurately characterizing its blood flow characteristics remains a major challenge due to the complex distribution and geometry of the cardiovascular system. This study introduces a novel multi - fractal vascular tree (MFVT) model. By integrating heterogeneous fractal dimensions and scaling laws, considering vessel branching and tortuosity, the model depicts blood flow across various vessels. Formulas for blood flow rates in single vessels, fractal vessel trees, and bundles of fractal vessel trees were derived, along with the analytical expression for cardiovascular system permeability. The model's reliability was verified via four case studies, with a maximum relative error of less than 5% between theoretical and experimental values. Sensitivity analyses showed that parameters significantly influenced blood flow. For instance, as the maximum diameter of zero-level vessels increased from 0.2 to 4 mm, the flow rate rose notably. When the diameter ratio increased from 0.5 to 0.8, the flow rate also increased, especially at higher pressure differences. An increase in the initial length of zero-level vessels from 5 to 50 mm led to a decrease in the flow rate. These phenomena indicate that blood flow resistance is negatively correlated with vessel diameter and positively correlated with vessel length. This work advances the mechanistic understanding of blood flow distribution and provides a computational tool for studying vascular pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.