Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204204›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An improved Q-learning approach for rescue path planning in mass casualty incidents under damaged road network conditions.

Sheng Wang, Jingrong Yang, Peng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheng WangComputer Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Jingrong YangComputer Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Peng YangComputer Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China. anymodel@email.tjut.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC3807402-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency rescue path planning faces severe challenges due to the uncertainty of the road network and the complexity of road damage following mass casualty incidents (MCIs) such as earthquakes. Traditional static path planning algorithms struggle to cope with such dynamic environments, while standard reinforcement learning methods often cause agents to fall into local optima, failing to meet rescue safety requirements. To address this dilemma, this paper proposes an improved Q-learning algorithm that integrates Adaptive Simulated Annealing (ASA) and Experience Replay (ER) mechanisms. The algorithm dynamically regulates the exploration degree via the ASA strategy, ensuring the agent can escape local traps in complex damaged environments. Furthermore, it incorporates the ER mechanism to reuse key path experiences, thereby improving convergence speed. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method demonstrates efficient online re-planning capabilities in response to structural environmental updates. It provides high-confidence decision support for time-critical post-disaster rescue, balancing the trade-off between accessibility and safety.

Identifiers

PMID42204204
PMCPMC13316011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.