ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning for apple leaf disease diagnosis: a comparative study with convolutional neural networks and transformers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant diseases pose a major threat to global food security, significantly reducing agricultural yields. Therefore, timely diagnosis of plant diseases can help prevent food losses and support economic stability. This study explores the use of eight Convolutional Neural Networks and two Vision Transformers for apple leaf disease diagnosis. The feature extraction layers of each model were modified to incorporate DropBlock layers, while preserving pretrained weights from the ImageNet dataset. Images from the Plant Pathology 2021 dataset were used to fine-tune the models for multi-label classification, targeting five disease categories and a healthy label. Three experiments were conducted to evaluate model performance on the test set. First, the ResNet50 model was used to determine optimal Dropout and DropBlock probabilities. Second, these parameters were applied across all models to identify those with the best performance. Finally, twenty-three Swarm Optimization Algorithms were used to optimize classifier thresholds, improving accuracy and F1-scores. A DropBlock probability of 0.05 and a Dropout probability of 0.2 yielded superior results. Among the models, SwinV2T attained an accuracy of 90.7%, while SwinV2S achieved the highest F1-score of 91.7%, slightly outperforming the ConvNeXtT and ConvNeXtS architectures. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of DropBlock regularization and optimized classifier thresholds, highlighting the superior performance of recent architectures and optimization algorithms over their older counterparts. These findings suggest that such networks hold substantial promise for accurately identifying and diagnosing apple leaf diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.