Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42204181›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2026

Food and garden organics (FOGO) compost application improves post-harvest chemical and sensory profiles of conventionally grown tomatoes.

Jia Wang, Joseph Robert Nastasi, Sangeeta Prakash, Buddhi Dayananda, Nicole Robinson, Susanne Schmidt, Marlize Zaretha Bekker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jia WangSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Joseph Robert NastasiSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sangeeta PrakashSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Buddhi DayanandaSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nicole RobinsonSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Susanne SchmidtSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Marlize Zaretha BekkerSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. m.bekker@uq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of food and garden organics (FOGO) compost into horticultural systems is promoted to improve soil health and advance circular economy goals; however, its impact on flavour quality and consumer perception remains poorly understood. In particular, most studies assess fruit quality at harvest, overlooking post-harvest processes critical to consumer experience. Here, we investigated the influence of FOGO compost on the flavour of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Ninja) under conventional commercial production conditions using integrated sensory and chemical approaches. Tomatoes grown with and without FOGO compost were evaluated at harvest maturity and following post-harvest storage. Consumer sensory analysis revealed no differences in preference at harvest maturity. However, after 7-day storage, FOGO tomatoes were preferred and described as sweeter, more aromatic, and less bland. These sensory differences were associated with higher total soluble solids, lower malic acid, elevated concentrations of umami-associated amino acids, and treatment-specific differences in aroma-active volatiles.

Identifiers

PMID42204181
PMCPMC13493838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.