ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Safe Handling and Clinical Administration of Antibody Drug Conjugates: Occupational Safety, Material Compatibility, and the Integration of CSTDs into Workflows.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a rapidly expanding class of therapeutics, combining the specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the potency of cytotoxic payloads. Their increasing clinical adoption introduces complex challenges for safe handling, preparation, and administration that extend beyond traditional hazardous drug and monoclonal antibodies - based therapies protocols. These inherent complexities of ADCs necessitate strict controls during handling and administration. This review outlines the current regulatory frameworks and institutional practices guiding ADC's in-use handling and highlights key limitations within these practice systems. We examine current handling practices, including the regulatory and institutional guidance landscape, engineering controls, aseptic compounding environments, and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), as well as the integration of closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) into clinical and pharmacy workflows. This paper addresses ADC dosing solution stability and administration material compatibility, highlighting risks such as undesired interaction with IV bag materials, tubing, and other administration components while identifying potential gaps in compatibility information availability and accessibility. In addition, the effectiveness of closed-system transfer devices (CSTDs) and their implementation into the clinical workflow are discussed. Finally, we provide recommendations to address the identified gaps to promote safer, more consistent clinical handling practices. Given the complexity of ADC products, the rise of novel ADC constructs, and their expanding application in targeted therapies and alternative administration routes, continued ADC-specific research and regulatory guidance will be essential to achieve safe and effective clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42204125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.