ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Outcomes of transmediastinal esophagectomy for patients with esophagogastric junction cancers.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to evaluate the outcomes of transmediastinal esophagectomy (TME) for esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) patients.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent TME for EGJC (Siewert Type II) between 2018 and 2023. Robot-assisted TME was performed using a robotic surgical system (DaVinci). Postoperative complications, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were investigated.
resultsThe median length of esophageal invasion was 3 cm. Adenocarcinoma was the most common tumor in our series (71.1%). A robotic approach was used for 25 (65.8%) patients. The most frequent major complication was pneumonia (≥ Grade I, n = 12, 31.6%), followed by recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (≥ Grade I, n = 6, 15.8%). The incidence of anastomotic leakage (≥ Grade II) was 5.3% (n = 2). The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. The 3-year OS and DFS rates were 67.5 and 51.8%, respectively. The distribution of pathological LN metastases did not significantly demarcate OS curves (P = 0.43), while significantly stratifying DFS curves (P < 0.001). Patients with both mediastinal and abdominal LN metastases had very poor DFS (2-year DFS; 0%).
conclusionsTME for EGJC can be performed safely without increasing complications such as severe anastomotic leakage and in-hospital death. The relatively high frequency of pneumonia should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.