Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42203963›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Comparison of the High-Voltage Electrical Stimulation and Fixed Diphasic Current in Viability of the Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap in Rats Submitted to Nicotine.

Lais Mara Siqueira das Neves, Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro, Carlos Eduardo Pinfildi, Sérgio Britto Garcia, Alexandre Marcio Marcolino, Ana Laura Martins de Andrade, João Eduardo de Araujo, Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lais Mara Siqueira das NevesPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional, Performance, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus GuirroPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional, Performance, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo PinfildiPost-Graduate Program Interdisciplinary in Health Sciences, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Santos Campus-UNIFESP/SP, Santos, Brazil.
Sérgio Britto GarciaPost-Graduate Program in Pathology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Marcio MarcolinoPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Araranguá, SC, Brazil.
Ana Laura Martins de AndradePostgraduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, Universidade Brasil, Rua Carolina Fonseca, 584-Itaquera, São Paulo, SP, CEP 08230-030, Brazil. anandrade90@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1137-7180
João Eduardo de AraujoPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional, Performance, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira GuirroPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional, Performance, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNicotine compromises tissue perfusion and may reduce the viability of surgical flaps. Electrical stimulation has been investigated as a therapeutic strategy to improve tissue repair and flap survival.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the effect of high-voltage electrical stimulation and fixed diphasic current on the viability of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in rats subjected to the action of nicotine

methodsThirty-six albino Wistar rats were divided into six groups: Saline Group = received saline solution; High-Voltage Electrical Stimulation Group = received saline solution and electrical stimulation with high-voltage current; Fixed Diphasic Current Group = received saline solution and electrical stimulation with fixed diphasic current; Nicotine Group = received nicotine; Nicotine + High-Voltage Electrical Stimulation Group = received nicotine and electrical stimulation with high-voltage current; Nicotine + Fixed Diphasic Current Group = received nicotine and electrical stimulation with fixed diphasic current. The application of high-voltage electrical stimulation or fixed diphasic current occurred immediately after surgery and during the subsequent two days. All groups were submitted to transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap surgery. The percentage of necrosis was assessed using AxioVision

resultsThe two electric currents were effective in increasing the viability of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap of rats submitted to nicotine. The fixed diphasic current showed better results, with decreased area of necrosis, increased number of mast cells, and increased number of fibroblast growth factor

conclusionsBoth electrical stimulation protocols improved flap viability in rats exposed to nicotine, with fixed diphasic current demonstrating superior effects. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Electric StimulationElectric Stimulation TherapyMyocutaneous FlapNicotineRectus AbdominisSurgical FlapsAnimalsGraft SurvivalImmunohistochemistryMaleRatsRats, WistarTissue SurvivalWound HealingNicotineElectrical stimulationFibroblast growth factorNicotinePhysiotherapyVascular endothelial growth factorWound healing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.