ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2026
Distinct repair outcomes from single and convergent replication fork collapse.
Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct repair outcomes from single and convergent replication fork collapse.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Replication fork collapse at single-strand DNA breaks threatens genome stability but how such forks are repaired and resolved has remained unclear. Here we replicate site-specific nicks with single or converging replication forks in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. Collapse of a single fork generates a single-ended double-strand break (DSB) that undergoes homologous recombination to yield stable D-loops and end-to-end fusions, yet does not restart DNA synthesis. Single collapsed forks can also undergo extensive nucleolytic degradation, appearing to disassemble the sister fork through 'secondary collapse' events that resolve single-ended DSBs without engaging DSB repair. In contrast, semisynchronous convergent collapse generates a double-ended DSB that is primarily repaired through annealing-dependent DSB repair, completing DNA synthesis but generating precise deletions and templated insertions. These error-prone products are not detected following single-fork collapse. Our findings demonstrate that single and semisynchronous convergent collapsed forks elicit distinct repair outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.