ArticleScientific reports2026
Antibiotic prescriptions in Lombardy Region according to WHO AWaRe classification: trend from 2000 to 2024.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance represents a significant threat to public health. The aim of the study was to examine trends in antibiotic prescription in Lombardy and to assess the prevalence and patterns according to the WHO AWaRe classification. This retrospective cohort study was based on healthcare utilization databases from the Lombardy Region, Italy. Residents between 2000 and 2024 who had at least one antibiotic prescription were included. Patients with antibiotic prescription were categorized into the three groups of the WHO AWaRe classification - Access, Watch, and Reserve. To assess temporal trends in the AWaRe classification, we performed a multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, year and Local Health Services. We recorded more than 148 million antibiotic prescriptions. The total annual prescriptions slightly decreased during the study period and the classes most prescribed were combinations of penicillins (28.5%), macrolides (19.3%) and fluoroquinolones (17.4%).Watch antibiotics accounted for 56.5% of all prescriptions, and Access for 43.5%. An increasing of the proportion of Access prescriptions and a corresponding reduction in the prescription of a Watch antibiotic was observed over time (p < 0.0001). Watch prescriptions varied slightly across local health services, from 54% to 61% of the total prescriptions. Watch antibiotics were prescribed more frequently with increasing age: 41.0% in children, 55.7% in adults, 65.8% in older adults and 71.8% in oldest old. Levels of Access antibiotics remained well below the WHO threshold (60%). Prescribing patterns were largely homogeneous across local health services and appeared to be influenced more by local prescribing practices than by overall antibiotic consumption. Older adults and oldest old were largely exposed to Watch antibiotics, underscoring the need for targeted antimicrobial stewardship strategies in this population. Continued surveillance using the WHO AWaRe framework, monitoring and trend analysis of antibiotic prescriptions may reinforce the optimization and appropriateness of community antibiotic prescribing. Furthermore, it can support clinicians and healthcare policymakers in implementing guidelines aimed at limiting the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.