ArticleScientific reports2026
An uncertainty-aware evaluation framework based on hierarchical vision transformers for robust cross-domain plant leaf disease classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant leaf disease detection is a critical task in precision agriculture, where reliable diagnosis under real-world conditions is essential for reducing crop losses and supporting timely intervention. Although deep learning models have achieved high classification accuracy, their performance often degrades under domain shift between controlled laboratory datasets and real-field environments, while predictive uncertainty and confidence calibration remain largely unaddressed.This study presents an uncertainty-aware cross-domain evaluation framework based on a Hierarchical Vision Transformer (HViT) for plant leaf disease classification. The framework integrates multi-scale feature learning with Monte Carlo Dropout-based predictive uncertainty estimation and temperature-based calibration to systematically analyze model behavior in terms of accuracy, reliability, and robustness. Experiments were conducted on two complementary datasets: the New Plant Diseases Dataset (controlled conditions) and the PlantDoc dataset (field conditions), enabling bidirectional cross-domain evaluation. Results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves superior performance, attaining 97.8% accuracy on controlled data and 93.6% on field data, while significantly improving calibration with lower Expected Calibration Error (ECE = 0.032 / 0.041), reduced Negative Log-Likelihood, and lower Brier score compared to baseline CNN and transformer models. Furthermore, the framework exhibits improved robustness under domain shift, with reduced performance degradation and stable uncertainty behavior. Overall, this study highlights the importance of integrating uncertainty estimation and calibration within a hierarchical transformer-based framework, providing a more reliable and deployment-ready solution for real-world agricultural disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.