ArticleScientific reports2026
Diagnosing morphology-vitality relationships through multifractal urban form metrics and explainable machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how urban morphology is associated with urban vitality is important for sustainable urban regeneration, yet conventional density-based indicators often fail to capture cross-scale heterogeneity in three-dimensional urban form. This study proposes a morphology-vitality diagnostic framework that integrates elevation-weighted multifractal analysis with explainable machine learning. Taking the main urban area of Jinan, China, as a case study, we derived multifractal metrics from building footprint and height data and constructed a composite vitality index using population, point-of-interest, and road-network indicators. XGBoost models and SHAP interpretation were used to examine the nonlinear association between morphological descriptors and urban vitality, while additional robustness analyses were conducted for the vitality index, feature sets, multifractal parameters, and threshold detection. The results show that the morphological heterogeneity index Δα is a key explanatory variable for vitality variation and remains highly ranked across alternative model settings. Baseline comparisons indicate that multifractal descriptors provide additional predictive information beyond conventional morphological indicators. A partial-dependence-based segmented regression further identifies a stable sensitive interval around Δα ≈ 1.82, with bootstrap and spatial-block robustness tests supporting the consistency of this threshold. Rather than implying direct causality, the proposed mismatch indicator is interpreted as a diagnostic measure of deviation between morphology-based predicted vitality and observed vitality. The framework contributes to SDG-oriented urban regeneration by providing a quantitative tool for identifying areas where morphological structure and functional performance are unevenly aligned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.