ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic response and pore evolution mechanism of composite improved loess using an eco-friendly curing agent and cement: a macroscopic and microscopic experimental study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the loose structure and insufficient dynamic stability of collapsible loess subgrades in Gangu, Gansu Province, as well as the engineering and environmental concerns associated with conventional stabilizers (high energy consumption and carbon emissions), this study proposes a composite stabilization strategy using an eco-friendly curing agent (EFCA) and P·O 42.5 Portland cement. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests and dynamic triaxial tests were performed, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image processing together with fractal theory was employed to systematically elucidate the macroscopic dynamic response and the microscopic pore-reconstruction and evolution mechanisms of the composite-improved loess. The results indicate that the optimal mix proportion determined by an orthogonal design is "6% cement + 0.02% curing agent", yielding a 28-day UCS of 2.51 MPa, which is 483% higher than that of the untreated loess. The dynamic resilient modulus (E
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.