ArticleScientific reports2026
Prioritizing psychological factors in young consumers' coffee brand preferences through a novel behavioral leadership fuzzy decision-making modelling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of systematic prioritization of the psychological factors that influence young consumers' coffee brand preferences has emerged as a significant problem. While existing studies focus on economic and technical factors, the inadequate consideration of psychological factors leads brands to misunderstand consumer expectations. In this context, the fundamental problem lies in the failure to identify the relative importance of the psychological factors shaping young consumers' brand preferences. The purpose of this study is to identify the most critical psychological factors influencing young consumers' coffee brand preferences, rank the importance of these factors, and guide brands in strategic direction by correlating the findings with investment strategies. The study proposes a new fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model. Expert weights are calculated using a Euclidean distances-based expert weighting approach, criteria importance levels are determined using the extended SIWEC, and the ARLON is used to rank strategy alternatives. Furthermore, behavioral leadership fuzzy sets, a new addition to the literature, are integrated into the model to reflect the behavioral dimensions of the decision-making process. This study contributes to the literature by proposing a new fuzzy decision-making model that prioritizes the importance of psychological factors in young consumers' coffee brand preferences and relates them to investment strategies. The key findings indicate that "identity and belonging" and "experiential satisfaction" are the most critical psychological criteria. Additionally, "experience and atmosphere" and "digitalization and innovation" strategies are the most significant alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.