ArticleScientific reports2026
An enhanced hypergraph CNN with adaptive focal loss for automated ECG heartbeat classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning techniques have shown significant promise for the automated diagnosis of CVD using ECG analysis. Nevertheless, several critical challenges persist with current approaches: severe class imbalance, intricate temporal dependencies, and poor modeling of inter-beat relationships ultimately limit clinical applicability. This work presents a novel hybrid deep learning framework that combines a CNN for time-domain feature extraction, k-nearest neighbor-based hypergraph construction with cosine similarity to model inter-beat dependencies, and a residual-connection-enhanced hypergraph neural network (EHGNN) for robust classification. To address class imbalance, focal loss is implemented with adaptive class weighting. For evaluation, our model was tested on two benchmark datasets: the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database and the St. Petersburg Institute of Cardiological Technics (INCART) 12-lead Arrhythmia Database. In the case of the MITBIH dataset, a classification accuracy of 98.66% was achieved using the AAMI five-class classification system, whereas the results indicated a three-class arrhythmia detection accuracy of 95.46% for the INCART database. The model demonstrated consistent performance on two separate data sets, thus emphasizing its ability to generalize well. These results confirm that the proposed framework effectively addresses class imbalance through focal loss and SMOTE, temporal dependencies through CNN-based feature extraction, and inter-beat relationships through EHGNN, demonstrating great potential for clinical diagnostic systems by capturing complex heartbeat patterns that are otherwise overlooked by standard models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.